Anto v. C.O.Devassykutty
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed Motor Accidents Claims Appeal alleging inadequacy of compensation. Found Tribunal amounts reasonable under various heads; no scope for interference.
What did the court decide?
None. Appeal against the quantum of compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal was dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
FRIDAY, THE 6TH JULY 2007 / 15TH ASHADHA 1929
MFA.No. 946 of 2002()
--------------------OPMV.1229/1996 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT: PETITIONER IN O.P.(M.V):
-----------------------------------------------------
ANTO, S/O. KUNJUVAREED, PARAKATTIL HOUSE CHATTIKULAM, MUKUNDAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.BABY SRI.A.N.SANTHOSH
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN O.P. (M.V):
---------------------------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal for the petitioner's injuries warrants interference?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anto
- respondent
C.O. Devassykutty
- respondent
Francis @ Babichan
- respondent
The New India Assurance Co.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court