Varghese v. Kerala State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the land acquisition appeal but clarified that appellants are entitled to statutory benefits including interest on solatium if not already granted.
What did the court decide?
Clarification that appellants are entitled to statutory benefits including interest on solatium if not granted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID
FRIDAY, THE 16TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 25TH KARTHIKA 1929
LA.App..No. 286 of 2002()
------------------------LAR.328/1998 of ADDL.SUB COURT, N.PARAVUR
APPELLANT: CLAIMANTS.
- VARGHESE, S/O. THARIYATH, THEKKANNATH, AVANAMCODE.
- VARGHESE, S/O. YACOB, KOORAN, -DO-
- BAIJU, S/O. PATHROSE, PYNADATH, -DO-
BY ADV. SRI.T.KRISHNAN UNNI
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the Additional Sub Court's land acquisition order should be allowed or dismissed despite the appellants not receiving full statutory benefits.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Varghese
- appellant
Vargheose
- appellant
Baiju
- respondent
Kerala State
- respondent
Kochi International Airport Society
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court