Sarada v. Ramu @ Ramachandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Tribunal. Held that the appeal became infructuous after the respondent deposited the awarded amount, thus closing the proceedings without substantive adjournment analysis.
What did the court decide?
The appeal is closed as infructuous; attachment of property to cease.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 2ND JULY 2007 / 11TH ASHADHA 1929
EFA.No. 23 of 1998()
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28/08/1997 IN I.A.2319/96 IN I.A.512 OF 1996 IN MVOP.720/1988 of MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, THRISSUR.
APPELLANT:
SARADA, W/O.KUNDAYI SANKARA NARAYANAN & D/O. THOTTUPPARA CHATHUNNY, NATTIKA DESOM & VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM
RESPONDENTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sarada
- respondent
Ramu @ Ramachandran
- respondent
Sankaranarayanan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court