The Kerala High Court, in a single line order, dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous without substantive reasoning or discussion of legal issues.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 20TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 29TH KARTHIKA 1929 CRP.No. 1771 of 2000(F)
----------------------AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15/07/2000 IN EP. 395 /1984 IN OS.133/1978 of I ADDL.M.C.,TRIVANDRUM
.................... REVN. PETITIONERS:
BY ADV. SRI.PIRAPPANCODE V.S.SUDHIR
SMT. RESMI G. NAIR.
RESPONDENTS:
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
M.N.Krishnan, J.
======================== C.R.P.No.1771 of 2000
========================
Dated this the 20th day of November, 2007.
ORDER
It is submitted that this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed
as infructuous.
M.N.Krishnan, Judge.
ess 21/11
Vijayan
Dinesh Kumar K.
Gomathi Amma Lalithamma
Krishnankutty
Sadanandan
Jagadamma
M.N. Krishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
