Disposed

Narayanan v. T.E.Vidyadharan

Kerala HC6 Aug 2007Crl.Rev.Pet/2087/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a criminal revision petition challenging a conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 due to a compromise. The parties settled under section 147 CrPC, signed the petition, and the Court recorded the composition, which operates as an acquittal under section 320(8) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Criminal revision petition disposed; composition recorded having effect of acquittal under section 320(8) CrPC.

Narayanan Vs T.E.Vidyadharan — Cheque Dishonour | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

MONDAY, THE 6TH AUGUST 2007 / 15TH SRAVANA 1929

¶5

Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 2087 of 2007()

¶6

-----------------------------CRA.336/2006 of ADDL. SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC), THODUPUZHA CC.693/2003 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT, NEDUMKANDOM

¶7

REVN. PETITIONER: APPELLANT/ACCUSED

¶8

¶9

NARAYANAN, THAKADIYIL HOUSE, MULAKARAMEDU KARA, KATAPPANA VILLAGE.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.C.K.VIDYASAGAR

¶11

SRI.P.CHANDY JOSEPH

¶12

RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶13

¶14

T.E.VIDYADHARAN, THANDASHERIL HOUSE, POTHINKANDOM BHAGOM, KARUNAPURAM VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK.

¶15

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.

¶16

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR SRI.PRASAD CHANDRAN

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/08/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶19

Crl. R.P. No. 2087 OF 2007 A

¶20

Dated this the 6^th day of August, 2007

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The revision petitioner, who was the accused in C.C.No.693/2003 on the file of the JFCM, Nedumkandam for an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, challenges the conviction entered and the sentence passed against him concurrently by the trial court for the said offence.

¶23

Pending this revision, the parties have settled the matter and have filed Crl.M.A.No.8330/2007 under section 147 of the Act for recording the composition entered into by them. The said petition has been signed by both the revision petitioner as well as the complainant and their respective counsels. The composition is recorded and it will have the effect of an acquittal within the meaning of section 320(8) Cr.P.C. Money, if any, paid by the revision petitioner pursuant to orders, if any, passed by the lower appellate court shall be refunded to the revision petitioner.

¶24

This revision petition is disposed of as above.

¶25

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

¶26

aks

Narayanan v. T.E.Vidyadharan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Narayanan v. T.E.Vidyadharan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Danesh Vs State of Kerala

Surendran M.K. Vs State of Kerala

Vasu Kunjikannan Maniyattoo Vs Asst.Collector of Customs

Iqbal Vs Gopi Pillai

Central Bureau of Investigation Vs Assam Brook Export Ltd.

Illikkal Joseph Vs T.Pathu