This is a short order dismissing a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by an accused seeking to quash an order refusing to allow further cross-examination of the complainant in a Section 138 NI Act case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2007 / 3RD SRAVANA 1929
Crl.MC.No. 4531 of 2003()
------------------------CC.340/2001 of JDUL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS, RAMANKARI
PETITIONER: ACCUSED:
C.J. EDWARD, CHERUKAD HOUSE, EDATHUA, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.R.SANTHOSH BABU
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT:
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.S.SIVAKUMAR SRI.JOHN VARGHESE SRI.T.SAJI
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Crl. M.C. No. 4531 OF 2003 B
Dated this the 25th day of July, 2007
O R D E R
Petitioner, who is the accused in C.C. No.340/2001 on the file of the JFCM, Ramankary for an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, seeks to quash AnnexureII order dated 26.7.2003 refusing the request to cross-examine the complainant further.
This petition is accordingly dismissed.
(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)
aks
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused is entitled to quash the order refusing a request for further cross-examination of the complainant.
Whether there was any irregularity in dismissing the application for further cross-examination.
C.J. Edward
State of Kerala
Alex Augustine
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
