had divorced his first wife. Now, as per the available evidence, it is clear that the petitioner herein is residing along with his first wife and children. It is the case of the first respondent that after the marriage, during her stay along with the petitioner herein in the matrimonial house, she was harassed by the petitioner herein as well as other members of the family which consists of ten in number and the first respondent was forced to work through out the day and night. It is, because of the illtreatment meted out by the first respondent, that she had left the matrimonial home and was residing in her parental house. It is also the case of the first respondent/wife that the petitioner herein who is the husband is not paying any amount for maintenance of the first and second respondents. The trial court, on the basis of the materials available and evidence on record, came to the conclusion that the petitioner herein has got sufficient means to maintain the claimants namely, his wife and daughter. I find no reason to interfere with the findings of the courts below regarding the monetary
