Allowed

Shaji @ Shahudheen v. S.I.of Police

Kerala HC2 Feb 2007Crl.MC/223/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court modified the bail condition in a criminal appeal, deleting the requirement for the petitioner to deposit cash security or file solvency. The petitioner was instead directed to report to the Investigating Officer on specific dates to ensure cooperation and prevent absconding.

What did the court decide?

Condition of cash deposit or solvency deleted; petitioner directed to report to Investigating Officer on specified dates.

Shaji @ Shahudheen Vs S.I.of Police — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 2ND FEBRUARY 2007 / 13TH MAGHA 1928

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 223 of 2007() -----------------------CMP.5419/2006 of JUDL.MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, KOCHI CRIME NO. 350/04 OF KOCHI KASABA POLICE STATION ....................

¶6

PETITIONER: ACCUSED.

¶7

¶8

SHAJI @ SHAHUDHEEN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/P. SAINUDHEEN, LAVUKULATHIL HOUSE, XXII/347, KUNNAKATTU BHAGOM, X WARD, CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR)

¶10

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT. -------------------------

¶11

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOCHI KASBA POLICE STATION.

¶12

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.S.U. NAZAR

¶14

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

R. BASANT, J.

¶16

- - - - Crl.M.C.No. 223 of 2007

¶17

¶18

Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2007

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The petitioner faces allegations under Sections 403, 406 and

¶21

420 I.P.C. He was arrested and produced before the learned Magistrate. He continues in custody from 23.8.2006. The learned Magistrate has granted bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions.

¶22

One of the conditions is that the petitioner must deposit cash security of Rs.30,000/-or file solvency for the same. This order was passed as early as on 10.10.2006. The petitioner has come to this Court complaining about the onerous nature of the said condition imposed. The counsel submits that the petitioner, who is in custody, is unable to raise the amount and consequently he is constrained to continue in custody from the date of his arrest notwithstanding the order granting him bail on 10.10.2006.

¶23

The learned counsel submits that if continued insistence on

¶24

the condition were made, the petitioner will have to languish in prison until the trial is over. In these circumstances a lenient view may be taken and the direction for cash deposit of Rs.30,000/- may be

¶25

Crl.M.C.No. 223 of 2007 2

¶26

dispensed with and deleted. The learned counsel points out that the other condition obliges the petitioner to execute a bond for Rs. 1,00,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like sum.

¶27

Notice was given to the learned Public Prosecutor. The learned Public Prosecutor only submits that appropriate orders may be passed.

¶28

Having considered all the relevant inputs, I am certainly satisfied

¶29

that the said condition imposed on the petitioner - i.e. deposit of cash security of Rs.30,000/- or file solvency for the same - can be deleted.

¶30

Of course, further conditions can be imposed to ensure that the petitioner does not abscond and co-operates with the Investigators.

¶31

This Crl.M.C. is accordingly allowed. Condition No.2 imposed that the petitioner must deposit cash security of Rs.30,000/- or file solvency for the same is altered and modified. It is directed, in supersession of that condition, that the petitioner must report before the Investigating Officer on the first and third Mondays of all English calender months between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m.

¶32

(R. BASANT) Judge

¶33

HO tm

¶34

Crl.M.C.No. 223 of 2007 3

Shaji @ Shahudheen v. S.I.of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaji @ Shahudheen v. S.I.of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramakrishnan.K.G. Vs State of Kerala

Pathu Hajumma Vs K.M.Andy

Immanuel Morris Vs State of Kerala

K.v.Ajeesh Vs State

Asokan Vs State, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor

M.Aboobacker Vs Fathimath Suhara