but the evidence of these witnesses was discarded by the trial court on the ground that even though PW1 reached the hospital more than two and a half hours after the alleged incident and after reaching the hospital, they waited for more than one hour. That suggests the injuries sustained by PW1 are not very serious. That apart, the doctor, who examined PW1, has not also given any evidence regarding the nature of the injuries. Ext.P6 wound certificate of PW1 has produced only during trial and not by the police. Hence, with regard to the injury sustained by PW1, there is no acceptable evidence and that apart, PW2 is the wife of PW1, her evidence is also not corroborating with the evidence of PW1 and there are contradictions. The trial court also found that the mother of both PW1 and the respondents was examined as DW1, who had stated before the court that she does not know what happened actually in the house and she also admitted that there was dispute about the property between herself and altercation happened in the house is also narrated by DW1 that there was only a commotion between the brothers regarding division of property. On this evidence, the trial court found that the prosecution has not
