The court held that the direction issued in the referenced judgment was complied with based on evidence produced by the respondent. Consequently, the contempt of court case was closed immediately.
The contempt of court case is closed as the judgment direction was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN
MONDAY, THE 12TH MARCH 2007 / 21ST PHALGUNA 1928 Con.Case(C).No. 287 of 2007(S) -----------------------------(AGAINST JUDGMENT IN W.P(C)25511/2006 DT. 13.10.2006)
PETITIONER
K.N.RAMACHANDRAN UNNI, S/O.VASUDEVAN UNNI, AGE 55, MALIAKKAL MADAM, VAYALAR P.O., CHERTHALA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.RAVINDRAN
RESPONDENTS: -------------
SMT.SYAMALADEVI THANKACHI, (FATHER'S NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN), SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD.
BY SC SHRI. M.K. CHANDRAMOHAN DAS
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.K.DENESAN, J.
Cont. Case No. 287 OF 2007
Dated this the 12th March, 2007.
JUDGMENT
In the light of Annexure R1 order produced along with the affidavit filed by the respondent, the position as on today is that direction issued in Annexure A1 judgment stands complied with. Contempt of court case is therefore closed.
K.K.DENESAN Judge
jj
K.N.RAMACHANDRAN UNNI
SMT.SYAMALADEVI THANKACHI
K.K.DENESAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
