Salimony K.K. v. N. Murukan Achari
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, petitioners alleged that the respondent deliberately disobeyed court orders. After reviewing administrative orders filed by the respondent, the court held there was no intentional disobedience and dropped the proceedings, reserving liberty to challenge the orders separately.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings in the contempt petition are dropped for the present.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:-
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
TUESDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2007 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1929
Cont.Case(C).No.1247 of 2006(S)
-----------------------------------------------------------ARISING FROM THE JUDGEMENT IN W.P.(C).NO.25076/2005 DATED 14/08/2006
PETITIONERS /PETITIONERS 1, 3 TO 5, 7 & 8 IN W.P.(C):-
- SALIMANI K.K., W/O.ASHOKAN, AGED 38 YEARS, RESIDING AT HARIKRIPA KANAKKARI VILLAGE, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM, HSST (JUNIOR) ZOOLOGY, GOVERNMENT MODEL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, KOTTAYAM.
- BINDU D., W/O. MURUKAN, AGED 36 YEARS, PUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE, MULAMTHURUTHY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM TALUK, ERNAKULAM HSST (JUNIOR) ZOOLOGY, GOVT. MODEL HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, PALAKKUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
- SHINY K.P., W/O. V.B. JAMES, AGED 34 YEARS, VAZHAMATTOM HOUSE, KALAMASSERY VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM TALUK HSST (JUNIOR), ZOOLOGY, GOVERNMENT HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, VENNALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was willful and deliberate disobedience of court orders by the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Salimani K.K. and others
- respondent
N. Murukan Achary
- respondent
V. Karthikeyan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court