The single-judge bench dismissed an application for anticipatory bail. The court observed that since no crime had been registered and the apprehension of arrest lacked basis, the application was rejected.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT MONDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2007 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1929 Bail Appl..No. 7373 of 2007(L) -----------------------------NO CRIME REGISTERED BY MATHILAKAM POLICE
: PETITIONER/ACCUSED ----------------------------------LALU, AGED 38 YEARS S/O. APPU, KAREEPADATH HOUSE, P.O.PARNOOR, THENIYEM VILLAGE, THRISSUR. BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT SRI.RANJIT BABU
RESPONDENTS: STATE ------------------
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
R.BASANT, J
B.A.No.7373 of 2007
Dated this the 10th day of December, 2007
ORDER
Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioner apprehends arrest on the allegation that he has committed non bailable offences. He apprehends such a complaint from one Baby or her husband.
(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
rtr/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted given that no crime has been registered and the apprehension of arrest is without basis.
Lalu
State of Kerala
R.Basant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
