This is an anticipatory bail application where the court dismissed the petition as agreed after the Investigating Officer withdrew the need to arrest the petitioners or array them as accused, deeming the apprehension without merit.
Application dismissed as agreed; no arrest required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT
WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2007 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1929
Bail Appl..No. 6031 of 2007(J)
-----------------------------CRIME NO.33/07 CHENGAMANAD POLICE STATION
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
BY ADV. SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24/10/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
R. BASANT, J.
Dated this the 24th day of October, 2007
O R D E R
Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioners had, in compliance with the interim direction dt. 9.10.2007, appeared before the Investigating Officer. They were interrogated. The Investigating Officer has not now perceived the need to array the petitioners as accused or to arrest them, submit the learned Prosecutor, on instructions.
tm
(R. BASANT) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners require arrest and anticipatory bail grant in light of the Investigating Officer's non-procedural stance.
JOHNY
M.T.JOSEPH
SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHENGAMANAD
STATE OF KERALA
R. BASANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
