Allowed

Anilkumar v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC6 Feb 2007Bail Appl./573/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to the first accused in Crime No. 66/07 under Section 498A IPC via Section 438 Cr.P.C., directing police to release him on bond conditioned on weekly reporting and surrender for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for one month on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of reporting, interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and surrender for regular bail.

Anilkumar Vs State of Kerala — Corruption | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 17TH MAGHA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 573 of 2007() ---------------------------CRIME NO. 66 OF 2007 OF KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION

¶5

PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED. -------------------------------

¶6

ANILKUMAR, S/O.BHASKARAN, PANOOR THEKKATHIYIL HOUSE, KALARI BHAGHAM MURIYIL, KALARI BHAGHAM VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK.

¶7

BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNA MANI

¶8

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT.

¶9

¶10

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶11

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE

¶12

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶14

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶15

Bail Application NO. 573 of 2007

¶16

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DATED: 06-02-2007

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the Ist accused in Crime No. 66/07 of Karunagappally Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec. 498 A I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

¶19

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶20

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

¶21

Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶22

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶23

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶24

Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶25

Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

¶26

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions,

¶27

the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶28

This application is allowed as above.

¶29

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶30

ani.

Anilkumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anilkumar v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ummer ,M, Vs State of Kerala

A.Ganesan Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation

Sasidharan.B. Vs Sub Inspector of Police

Pradeep Vs State of Kerala

Subhash Varma Vs State of Kerala

A.M.Abdul Majeed Vs State of Kerala and Another