Allowed

A.Sainulabdeen v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC5 Feb 2007Bail Appl./536/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala granted anticipatory bail to 14 petitioners accused in a criminal case involving Sections 143, 147, 148, 324, and 308 IPC, allowing it for one month subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for one month with bond and sureties, subject to conditions of reporting, availability for interrogation, and non-tampering with evidence.

A.Sainulabdeen Vs State of Kerala — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

MONDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 16TH MAGHA 1928

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 536 of 2007()

¶6

---------------------------CRMP.168/2007 of DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD

¶7

CRIME NO.7/07 OF VADAKKANCHERRY POLICE STATION

¶8

: PETITIONERS/ACCUSED:

¶9

¶10

A. SAINULABDEEN, AGED 45 YEARS,

¶11

S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, NAFSIYA MANZIL, PADINHARUMURI, THEKKEPOTTA, PUTHUKODE, PALAKKAD.

¶12

T.A. SAIDALAVI, AGED 50 YEARS,

¶13

S/O. ABDUL RAHIMAN, THARISIL HOUSE, -DO-.

¶14

K. HAMSA, AGED 48 YEARS,

¶15

S/O. KOYAN, APPAKKAD, PUDUKKODE -DO-.

¶16

P.S. ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. SYED MOHAMMED, PADINHARUMURI HOUSE, THEKKEPOTTA POST, PALAKKAD.

¶17

MOIDEENKUTTY, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O. LATE KOYAN, KARACHI THUPPAM KADU, THEKKEPOTTA, PUTHUKKODE, ALATHUR TALUK.

¶18

THANGAL, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. SAITHALAVI, VALANKODE, MUTHAYAMKODE, PUTHUKKODE, PALAKKAD.

¶19

T.S. ABDUL RAHIMAN @ THANGALIKUTTY, AGED 58 YEARS, S/O. SAITHALI, CHENNALAMKUNDU, THEKKEPOTTA, PUTHUKODE, ALATHUR.

¶20

BADHAR, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O.VAKKUTTY, VALANKODE -DO-.

¶21

SHAHUL HAMEED, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.LATE VAVAN, VALANKODE -DO-.

¶22

T.K. SULAIMAN, AGED 50 YEARS,

¶23

S/O.LATE KOYAN, THOTTUMPALLAM, THEKKEPOTTA -DO-.

¶24

T.A. SALEEM, S/O.LATE ATHAR ROWTHER, AGED 44 YEARS, KOKKIKULAM, PUDUKODE.

¶25

SUBAIR, S/O. YOUSAF, AGED 34 YEARS, APPAKKAD, PUDUKKODE, ALATHUR.

¶26

SHERIF, S/O. CHELLAKUTTY,

¶27

AGED 25 YEARS, THUPPUMKADE, THEKKEPOTTA,PUDUKKODE.

¶28

C.M. ABDUL KHADER, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O. KALANTHAR MUHAMMED, CHOORIPADAM, PUDUKKODE, ALATHUR.

¶29

BY ADV. SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN

¶30

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT:

¶31

¶32

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING THE S.I. OF POLICE, VADAKKENCHERRY POLICE STATION.

¶33

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.P.N.SUKUMARAN

¶34

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶35

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶36

B.A. No. 536 OF 2007 B

¶37

Dated this the 5^th day of February, 2007

¶38

O R D E R

¶39

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 14 in Crime No.7/2007 of Vadakkancherry Police Station for an offence punishable under Secs.143, 147, 148, 324 and 308 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

¶40

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶41

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the said officer and subject to the following conditions:

¶42

a. Petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶43

BA.536/07

¶44

¶45

b. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶46

c. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶47

d. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶48

e. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

¶49

If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions,

¶50

the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶51

This application is allowed as above.

¶52

Sd/- (V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

¶53

aks

¶54

/ True Copy /

¶55

P.A. To Judge

A.Sainulabdeen v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Sainulabdeen v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrakumar K Vs State of Kerala

Shaju @ Kunjukuttan Vs State of Kerala

Santhosh N.B. Vs State of Kerala

Ummer ,M, Vs State of Kerala

A.Ganesan Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation

Sasidharan.B. Vs Sub Inspector of Police