Dismissed

A.Chandran v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Feb 2007Bail Appl./267/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The judge rejected the request, noting the petitioner was a second-time applicant and faced multiple pending charges, directing him to surrender and apply for regular bail instead.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to surrender and apply for regular bail within two weeks; other appeals disposed of.

A.Chandran Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 1ST FEBRUARY 2007 / 12TH MAGHA 1928

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 267 of 2007() ---------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.7698/2006 Dated 02/01/2007

¶6

.................... CRIME NO.298/06 OF ARYANCODE POLICE STATION

¶7

: PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED

¶8

--------------------------------------A.CHANDRAN, S/O.APPU, NEAR R.C.CHURCH, VALIYAVAZHY, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR

¶10

RESPONDENTS: STATE AND COMPLAINANT

¶11

¶12

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶13

SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARYANCODE POLICE STATION.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

B.A. No. 267 OF 2007

¶18

Dated this the 1^st day of February, 2007

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, who is the first accused in Crime No.298/2006 of Aryancode Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 324, 325, 323 and 308 read with section 34 I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail. The occurrence took place on 5.12.2006 at 8.30 p.m. during which the de facto complainant is alleged to have been attacked by the petitioner using a sword.

¶21

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application submitting, inter alia, that apart from the fact that this is the second application for anticipatory bail, the petitioner is an accused in crime No.99/2004 of Thambanoor Police Station for an offence punishable under section 401 IPC, crime No.519/06 of Chathannoor Police Station for an offence punishable under section 48(c) of the Kerala Police Act and crime No.420/06 of Kuzhithura Police Station for an offence punishable under section 379 IPC.

¶22

Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the

¶23

¶24

BA.267/07

¶25

petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same date on which it

¶26

is filed.

¶27

With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

¶28

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

¶29

aks

A.Chandran v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Chandran v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bineesh Vs State of Kerala

Habeeb Vs State of Kerala

Unnikrishnan Nair Vs State of Kerala

Ashkar Saleem Vs S.H.O.

Abdul Kalam Azad Vs State of Kerala

Mahesh Vs State of Kerala