Bijoy v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court declined direct anticipatory bail for petitioners accused in an offences case under IPC sections. Instead, the court ordered them to surrender for investigation between May 29-31, 2007, followed by regular bail consideration before a Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
Direction to surrender for interrogation between May 29-31, 2007, to seek regular bail before the Magistrate.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2007 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1929
Bail Appl..No. 2413 of 2007() ----------------------------CRIME NO.52/2007 OF PUTHENVELIKKARA POLICE STATION
PETITIONERS
- BIJOY.T.B., AGED 27 YEARS, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN, THACHERY HOUSE, PUTHENVELIKKARA, ERNAKULAK DISTRICT.
- GEORGEKUTTY @ GEORGE, AGED 26 YEARS, THADIKKARAN HOUSE, PUTHENVELIKKARA, ERNAKULAK DISTRICT.
- BINOY T.B., AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.BALAKRISHNAN,THACHERY HOUSE, PUTHENVELIKKARA,ERNAKULAK DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.C.C.THOMAS
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 326, and 307 IPC read with Section 149 IPC.
Whether the petitioners should be directed to surrender for interrogation before applying for regular bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bijoy.T.B. and others
- respondent
The State of Kerala
Coram
V. Ramkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court