The Kerala High Court dismissed a bail application filed by an accused charged with offences under the Abkari Act for possession of arrack. The court found insufficient grounds for release. (1 paragraph)
The bail application was dismissed; the accused is not released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 18TH JANUARY 2007 / 28TH PAUSHA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 205 of 2007() ---------------------------CMP.8292/2006 of JFCM., KAYAMKULAM CR 258/06 of Mavelikkara Excise Range
: PETITIONER/ACCUSED -----------------------------------
VIJAYAKUMAR, S/O.THANKAPPAN, AMRITHABHAVANAM, EREZHA THEKKUM MURI, PERINGALA VILLAGE, MAVELIKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.RASHEED C.NOORANAD
RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT AND STATE
STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI. JAI GEORGE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.A.No. 205 of 2007
V.Ramkumar, J.
========================
========================
Dated this the 16th day of January, 2007.
ORDER
Petitioner, who is the accused in CR No.258 of 2006 of Mavelikkara Excise Range for offences punishable under Section 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act, for having been found in possession of 750 ml. of coloured arrack on 15.12.2006 and who was arrested on the same day, seeks his enlargement on bail.
This application is accordingly dismissed.
V.RAMKUMAR,
JUDGE.
ess 18/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the requirements of Clause (b)(ii) of Section 41A of the Abkari Act were satisfied to grant bail.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijayakumar
State of Kerala
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
