Allowed

Raimon v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC17 Jan 2007Bail Appl./201/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Kerala allowed the petitioner's enlargement on bail in a robbery and criminal conspiracy case, subject to execution of a bond and compliance with reporting and non-interference conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond for Rs. 10,000 with two sureties for like amount, subject to reporting, interrogation availability, and non-interference conditions.

Raimon Vs State of Kerala — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH JANUARY 2007 / 27TH PAUSHA 1928

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 201 of 2007(R)

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO. 575 OF 2006 OF CHENGAMANADU POLICE STATION

¶7

PETITIONER:

¶8

¶9

RAIMON, S/O.VARGHESE, AGED 35 YEARS, KANNAMPILLY HOUSE, NJALOOKKARA, AZHIKAM KARA, ANGAMALY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.JESWIN P.VARGHESE

¶11

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT:

¶12

¶13

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI./ JAI GEORGE

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

¶18

Bail Application NO. 201 of 2007

¶19

- - - - DATED: 17-01-2007

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the

¶22

14^th accused in Crime No.575/06 of Chengamanadu Police Station for offences punishable under Secs. 395, 120B and 412 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. Petitioner was arrested on 17-112006.

¶23

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶24

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M - I, Aluva and subject to the following conditions:

¶25

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶26

B.A. No.201 of 2007

¶27

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

¶28

3.. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶29

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶30

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the

¶31

bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶32

This application is allowed as above.

¶33

Sd/- V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

ani.

/true copy/

P.A. to Judge.

B.A. No.201 of 2007

Raimon v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raimon v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anilkumar Vs Excise Inspector of Police

Sophy Korea Vs State of Kerala

Amshan Pillai Vs the State of Kerala

E.K.Nassar Vs the Circle Inspector of Police

Shibu Vs State of Kerala

Hussain Vs State of Kerala