P.K.Raju v. Philip
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed as dispute settled out of court. Consequential connected motions also dismissed. No substantive legal proposition or outcome established.
What did the court decide?
Appeals and connected motions dismissed as settled out of court.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 3RD JULY 2007 / 12TH ASHADHA 1929
AS.No. 369 of 1993()
-------------------OS.338/1992 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, PALAKKAD ....................
APPELLANT: DEFENDANT:
P.K.RAJU, S/O.THATTAMPADAVIL C.P.KURUVILA, RESIDING AT ELAVAMPADOM, VANDAZHI AMSOM, AND
DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.VIDYASAGAR
SRI.B.JAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFFS
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.K.Raju
- respondent
Philip
- respondent
Rosamma Philip
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court