M.C.Geetha v. Puthiyavalappil Choyin Bhagya Sobana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the Sub Court dismissed the application for inspection without considering it on merits. The petition was disposed of with direction to file a review application.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to file a review application in the Sub Court on record of the Ext.P6 order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 14TH NOVEMBER 2006 / 23RD KARTHIKA 1928
WP(C).No. 30004 of 2006(V)
-------------------------OS.94/2002 of ADL.SUB COURT, THALASSERY ....................
PETITIONER:
M.C. GEETHA, W/O. RAVINDRAN, `SANGEETH', PALLIKKUNNU AMSOM DESOM, KANNUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.V.R.KESAVA KAIMAL SRI.N.M.MADHU
RESPONDENTS: -------------
PUTHIYAVALAPPIL CHOYIN BHAGYA SOBHANA D/O.SARADA, `SREE', CHALAD-KANNUR.
BY //
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/11/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the application for inspection of register was passed on merits or solely on grounds of delay.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.C. Geetha
- respondent
Puthiyavalappil Choyin Bhagya Sobhana
Coram
M. Sasidharan Nambiar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court