Case brief
What is this about?
WP No. 9969 of 2026 (KLR-RES), High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, decided 06.04.2026 by R Devdas, J. Petitioner Smt. Neelamma sought certiorari under Article 226 to quash the order dated 11.12.2025 of the Tahasildar, Saligrama (respondent No.4), in Dispute/129 Case No. RRTDISPO/182/2025 (Annexure-D) refusing change of khata. The court upheld the Additional Government Advocate's (Smt. B.P. Radha) preliminary objection that the order is appealable before the Assistant Commissioner under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and disposed of the petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Assistant Commissioner. Keywords: change of khata; Tahsildar; Karnataka Land Revenue Act Section 136(2); appeal; alternative remedy; certiorari; writ disposed; Saligrama; Mysuru; RRTDISPO.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Assistant Commissioner to redress her grievances; the Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within four weeks.