Disposed¶38

Sri.M.Dilip Kumar v. the Commissioner

Karnataka HC24 Feb 2026WP/9885/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition, mandamus, Articles 226 and 227, BBMP, unauthorised illegal construction, plan sanction absent, Section 243 Greater Bengaluru Governance Act 2024, statutory notice deadline 04.03.2026 with inspection report, representations dated 11.02.2025 Annexure-D to D4, petition disposed, single-judge order of Suraj Govindaraj J., High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents No. 1 to 5 to issue appropriate notices by 04.03.2026 accompanied by the inspection report. ¶38

Sri.M.Dilip Kumar Vs the Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:13476 WP No. 9885 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 24^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 9885 OF 2025 (LB-BMP)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI.M.DILIP KUMAR S/O S. MURUGESH AGED 40 YEARS, NO.3060/A, 1^ST MAIN, 1^ST CROSS, GAYATHRINAGAR, BANGALORE 560 021

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. K.N. NITISH., ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER BBMP, N.R. SQUARE, BANGALORE - 560 001

¶15

Digitally signed by VARSHA N RASALKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶16

THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING AUTHORITY BBMP,2^ND FLOOR, N.R. SQUARE, NEAR M.S. BUILDING, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 002

¶17

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BBMP, NO.1, BEGUR ROAD, BOMMANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 068

¶18

THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BBMP, 9TH MAIN, 14^TH B CROSS ROAD, SECTOR 6, HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 102

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:13476 WP No. 9885 of 2025

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BBMP, 9^TH MAIN, 14^TH B CROSS ROAD, SECTOR 6, HSR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 102

¶22

SMT. V. RAMYA W/O NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, DHANAMITTENAHALLI VILLAGE, KONAPALLI POST, CHINTAMANI TALUK, KONAPALLI, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT 563 125

¶23

SRI.K.P. ABU SAB AGED 69 YEARS, S/O K.P POKAR SAB, R/A NO. 83, THIMMAIAH ROAD, NEHRUPURAM, SHIVAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560001.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. VAIBHAV RAVI MALIMATH.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R5; SRI. KRISHNA S. VYAS., ADVOCATE FOR R6 & R7)

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE R1 TO R5 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS AT ANNX-D TO D4 DTD 11.02.25 WITH IN A TIME FRAME AND TAKE ACTION AGAINST UNAUTHORIZED AND ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION THAT IS BEING MADE BY R6 AND ETC.

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶28

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

¶29

ORAL ORDER

¶30

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the

¶31

following reliefs:

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:13476 WP No. 9885 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

a. Issue a writ, in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction, directing the respondents No. 1 to 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner at Annexure-D to D4 dated 11.02.2025 within a time frame and take action against the unauthorized and illegal construction that is being made by the 6^th Respondent.

¶36

b. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Hon’ble Courts deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.

¶37

A report has been submitted by respondents no.1 to 5 that the construction put up by respondents no.6 and 7 is without a plan sanction and that the submission is that necessary statutory notices would be issued under Section 243 of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 2024within one week from today.

¶38

The said submission answers the grievance of the petitioner directing respondents no.1 to 1 to 5 to issue appropriate notices by 04.03.2026 accompanied by the inspection report, the petition stands disposed.

¶39

Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE

¶40

PRS, List No.: 2 Sl No.: 62

Sri.M.Dilip Kumar v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.M.Dilip Kumar v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Ajay Mandira Cariappa Vs the Chief Commissioner

Smt. Ambuja G Vs Bangalore Central City Corporation.

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs Bangalore Central City Corporation Circle

Mr M Krishnappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri M Mohan Vs State of Karnataka

Mstr.Mohammed Aris Vs Assistant Director Statistics and the Chief Registrar of Births and Deaths