Disposed¶40

M S Yogesh v. Prakash M S

Karnataka HC21 Feb 2026WP/9489/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; single judge (S.R. Krishna Kumar); order dated 21.02.2026; Article 227 Constitution of India; GM-CPC; Mandya; II Additional District and Sessions Judge; I.A.No.2 in R.A.No.9/2021; Annexure-H; withdrawal memo; disposed of as withdrawn; no merits adjudicated; negligible precedential value.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to the petitioners to withdraw the writ petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn. ¶40

M S Yogesh Vs Prakash M S — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:10820 WP No. 9489 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.9489 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

M.S. YOGESH S/O. M.S. SIDDARAMU AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

¶9

M.S. DURGASHREE W/O DAYANANDA AND S/O M.S. SIDDARAMU AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶10

R.K. HEMALATHA W/O M.S. SIDDARAMU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶11

ALL ARE RESIDING AT MANGALA VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBALI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.

¶12

Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI. AKARSH KUMAR GOWDA, ADVOCATE)

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

AND:

¶16

PRAKASH M.S. S/O LATE K. SIDDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

¶17

KUMARASWAMY S/O LATE K. SIDDEGOWDA, UNMARRIED, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

¶18

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:10820 WP No. 9489 of 2025

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

PAVITHRA W/O M.S. PRAKASHA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

¶21

PUTTAMMA W/O SIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

¶22

RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE ALL RESIDING AT MANGALA VILLAGE, KOTHATHI HOBLI, MANDYA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571 478.

¶23

SHRINIVASAREDDY S/O LATE NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/AT NO.45/1, MEENAKSHI LAYOUT, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA ELECTRONIC CITY POST, BANGALORE-560 100.

¶24

SADASHIVA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKAPPA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT RAYASANDRA VILLAGE, SARZAPURHOBLI, ANEKALLU TALUK, BANGALORE-560 099.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. K.P. BHUVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R.1;

¶27

R.2, R.3 AND R.4 ARE SERVED.)

¶28

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2024 MADE IN I.A.NO.2 IN R.A.NO.9/2021 PASSED BY

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:10820 WP No. 9489 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MANDYA VIDE ANNEXURE-H, ETC.

¶33

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶34

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶35