Writ petition filed to quash an order and allow a review application under the Code of Civil Procedure. The High Court observed that since a related civil memo appeal was pending, the writ petition became infructuous and was disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:19634 WP No. 925 of 2022
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO. 925 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
MRS. VEENA GOVERDHAN W/O MR. GOVERDHAN JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO 42, BASAPPA ROAD SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI VIVEK HOLLA, HOLLA & HOLLA, ADV.)
AND:
Digitally signed by NANDINI M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BOTH THE ABOVE ARE RESIDING AT NO.42, BASAPPA ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 027.
(BY SRI SIDDHARTH SUMAN, ADV.)
…RESPONDENTS
THIS W.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TOQUASH THE ORDER DTD.9.12.2021 PASSED BAY THE III ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BANGALORE )CH NO.25) ANNEXURE-P IN O.S.NO.6648/2019 AND FURTHER BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE REVIEW APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 47 RULE READ WITH SECTIONS 114, 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1908.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2026:KHC:19634 WP No. 925 of 2022
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of SATHEESH.V.K. VS FEDERAL BANK LTD. - 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2046 and since the order of the Trial Court rejecting the prayer for temporary injunction is challenged before this Court in MFA.No.7163/2021 & MFA.No.7168/2021, this writ petition
does not survive for consideration.
disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE
KK
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
SATHEESH.V.K. VS FEDERAL BANK LTD. - 2025 SCC OnLine SC 2046Referred¶24
MRS. VEENA GOVERDHAN W/O MR. GOVERDHAN JAYARAM
MR. MOHAN JAYARAM S/O LATE MR. M. JAYARAM
MRS. JAYALAXMI JAYARAM W/O LATE MR. M. JAYARAM
VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
