Workman challenged a Labour Court interim-application order and sought directions under Section 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act regarding legal representation and production of documents. The High Court noted the main reference was already disposed of, so the challenge to the interim order did not survive, and dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2026:KHC:35334 WP No. 902 of 2017
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JULY, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 902 OF 2017 (L-TER)
BETWEEN:
KRISHNA K., S/O. KARIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING THAT CHICKKAVITTANAHALLI VILLAGE, BOMMANIPURA, GOLLARADODDI, KASABAHOBLI, TAGACHIGERE POST, CHANNAPATTANA(TQ), RAMANAGARA(DIST)-571501. REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER SHRI. STHITHAPRAJNA SWAMIJI.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. S.K.KALLEGOWDA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2026:KHC:35334 WP No. 902 of 2017
HC-KAR
P.E.S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, 100 FEET RING ROAD, BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU-560085.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.R.ANAND, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2 VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 14.08.2017, NOTICE TO R3 IS DESPENSED WITH)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Sri.S.K.Kallegowda., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.K.R.Anand., counsel for respondents 1 and 2 have appeared in person.
NC: 2026:KHC:35334 WP No. 902 of 2017
HC-KAR
1947, since the petitioner is conducting the case as party in person.
NC: 2026:KHC:35334 WP No. 902 of 2017
HC-KAR
Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/(JYOTI M) JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18.1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Labour Court's order on an interim application in Reference No.19/2013 could be challenged when the main reference itself stood disposed of?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Krishna K.
Shri M.R.Doreswamy
Shri K.N.Balasubrahmanya Murthy
Shri Umapathy
Jyoti M
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
