Dismissed

Sri Kariyappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Karnataka HC16 Sept 2026WP/8681/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive hearing dates (15.09.2026 and 16.09.2026). Any interim orders were discharged and pending interlocutory applications were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order discharged; pending interlocutory applications disposed of.

Sri Kariyappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:50453 WP No. 8681 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

CNR: KAHC010186212022

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 16^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 8681 OF 2022 (SC/ST)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. KARIYAPPA, S/O. LATE TALYADA HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT DEVAPURA VILLAGE, MADADAKERE HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577527.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. PARINEETA S. CHANAL, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA-577201.

¶16

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DAVANAGERE SUB-DIVISION, DAVANAGERE-577201

¶17

D.H.RUDRAPPA

¶18

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS

¶19

SMT. DRAKSHYANAMMA, SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS (AMENDED CAUSE TITLE CARRIED OUT AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 01.08.2023)

¶20

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

NC: 2026:KHC:50453 WP No. 8681 of 2022

¶23

CNR: KAHC010186212022

¶24

SRI. R.PRAKASH, S/O. LATE RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

¶25

SMT. SUMITHRA, D/O. LATE RUDRAPPA, W/O. E.MALLIKARJUNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,

¶26

RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE R/AT DEVAPURA VILLAGE, MADADAKERE HOBLI, HOSADURGA TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577527.

¶27

…RESPONDENTS

¶28

(BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; SRI. VISHNU HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R4 AND R5; VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 01.08.2023, R4 AND R5 ARE LRS OF DECEASED R3)

¶29

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶30

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶31

ORAL ORDER

¶32

Though matter called twice, there is no

¶33

representation on behalf of petitioner.

¶34

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:50453 WP No. 8681 of 2022

¶35

HC-KAR

¶36

CNR: KAHC010186212022

¶37

The petition was listed on 15.09.2026. On that day also, there was no representation on behalf of petitioner and hence, it was ordered to be listed today i.e., 16.09.2026 and it was also ordered that if none appears on behalf of the petitioner on the next date of hearing, the petition will be dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶38

As already noted above, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶39

Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.

¶40

Sd/(JYOTI M) JUDGE

¶41

¶42

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

Sri Kariyappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Kariyappa v. the Deputy Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases