M. G. Patila v. the Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court at Bengaluru; WP No. 805 of 2019 (BDA); petitioner M.G. Patila (aged 61, Vijayanagara, Bengaluru), counsel Sri Sameer S.N. (absent); respondent Commissioner, Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA), counsel Smt. A.D. Vijaya. Filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for direction to BDA to consider representation at Annexure-E1 dated 03.11.2018 and execute absolute sale deed in petitioner's favour. Dismissed for non-prosecution on 25 June 2026 owing to absence of petitioner/petitioner's counsel; coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Nataraj (oral order). No precedent cited; no costs or quantum awarded.
What did the court decide?
There was no representation for the petitioner although the case was called twice on the hearing date, and there had been no appearance on the last date as well. ¶¶21