Sri B S Nataraj v. Smt Usha Jayaraj
Case brief
What is this about?
WP No. 7640 of 2022 (GM-CPC), High Court of Karnataka, Vijaykumar A. Patil, J., decision dated 10 June 2026. Article 227 writ petition challenging trial court order dated 21.03.2022 in O.S.No.693/2022 (XXIV Addl. City Civil and Session Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-6)) and seeking allowance of interlocutory applications (Annexures D and E). Dismissed as infructuous after counsel's memo recorded that IA No.1 was allowed by the Trial Court on 19.04.2024. No substantive holdings, no cases cited, no quantum. Parties: B.S. Nataraj (petitioner) v. Usha Jayaraj, H.P. Mahesh and Geetha N. (respondents).
What did the court decide?
In view of the memo filed by learned counsel for the petitioner recording that Interlocutory Application No.1, the subject matter of challenge, had already been allowed by the Trial Court by order dated 19.04.2024, the grievance no longer survived and the writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.