Dismissed¶28

Mr Jeevan Raj v. Mrs. Divya

Karnataka HC15 Jun 2026WP/7224/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition on amicable settlement; Jeevan Raj v. Divya; WP No. 7224 of 2025 (GM-FC); High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru; Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha; decision dated 15.06.2026; challenge to order dtd. 16.12.2024 in I.A.No.2/2024 in M.C.No.242/2024 of the I Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, D.K., Mangaluru; Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; memo of settlement filed; dismissed as withdrawn; I.A.No.1/2025 closed; advocates: Sri. Dhananjay Kumar (Ms. Samanvi appeared) for petitioner, Sri. Melwyn David Mascarenhas for respondent; no merits decided; no precedent treatment; no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; proceedings in I.A.No.1/2025 closed. ¶28

Mr Jeevan Raj Vs Mrs. Divya — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:28783 WP No. 7224 of 2025

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA WRIT PETITION NO. 7224 OF 2025 (GM-FC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

MR JEEVAN RAJ, S/O. SANJEEVA MOLLY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT D.NO. 2-12B/11, SAMRUDHI HOUSE, NEAR CHECK POST, NEAR GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL, THIRUVAIL, VAMANJOOR, MANGALORE- 575028.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. DHANANJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

AND: Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN MRS. DIVYA, Location: HIGH D/O. GANGADHAR DEVADIGA, COURT OF AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO. 3-136, VIJAYA KARNATAKA NIVASA, ATHIKARIBETTU VILLAGE, MANGALORE- 574154.

¶13

…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MELWYN DAVID MASCARENHAS, ADVOCATE)

¶14

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 16.12.2024 PASSED IN I.A.NO.

¶15

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:28783 WP No. 7224 of 2025

¶16

HC-KAR

¶17

2/2024 IN M.C.NO. 242/2024 BY THE I ADDL. PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, D.K., MANGALURU AGAINST THE PETITIONER (VIDE ANNX-A).

¶18

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶19

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶20

ORAL ORDER

¶21

Ms.Samanvi representing Sri.Dhananjay Kumar learned counsel on record for the petitioner submits that the matter was settled amicably between the parties and therefore, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Memo to the effect is also filed.

¶22

No representation on respondent's side on call.

¶23

Having considered the submission that is made by

¶24

learned counsel who represents the petitioner and on going through the contents of the memo, permission as prayed for is accorded.

¶25

NC: 2026:KHC:28783 WP No. 7224 of 2025

¶26

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28