Disposed

M/S Trinayani Realtors Private Limited v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC13 Mar 2026WP/6887/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227, the petitioner sought to quash a certificate. The court disposed of the petition based on a joint memo where the petitioner undertook to hand over land possession and respondents undertook to pass an award under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, with strict adherence by both parties.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of without adjudication on merits; undertakings in the joint memo must be strictly adhered to by both parties.

M/S Trinayani Realtors Private Limited Vs State of… — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:15037 WP No. 6887 of 2026

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 13^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 6887 OF 2026 (LA-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

M/S. TRINAYANI REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, A COMPNAY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.3, SATTVA WINDSOR, ULSOOR ROAD, BENGALURU-560042, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY MR. ASHWIN SANCHETI.

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY SRI. BADRI VISHAL, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

¶16

MS BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶17

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, 1^ST FLOOR, BEERASANDRA, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 572114.

¶18

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION,

¶19

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:15037 WP No. 6887 of 2026

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

DODDABALLAPURA, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-561203.

¶22

THE TAHSILDAR, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110.

¶23

KARNATAKA STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., 4^TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU EAST WING, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANGING DIRECTOR, BENGALURU.

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. A.S. HARISH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. T. P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

¶26

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE CERTIFICATE DATED 16.02.2026 STYLED AS "¨sÀÆ«ÄAiÀÄ ºÀ¸ÁÛAvÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀæ", BEARING

¶27

NO.LND/CR:01/2025 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3TAHASILDAR, DEVANAHALLI TALUK AND ETC.,

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:15037 WP No. 6887 of 2026

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

ORAL ORDER

¶33

The present petition has been filed seeking for setting aside the certificate at Annexure-A which is styled as "¨sÀÆ«ÄAiÀÄ ºÀ¸ÁÛAvÀgÀ ¥ÀvÀ æ ", without entering into the detailed

¶34

facts and controversy on hand, noticing that the joint

¶35

memo is filed, petition may be disposed of.

¶36

The said joint memo reads as hereunder:

¶37

"The Petitioner and Respondents 1 to 4 submits as follows:

¶38

1.The Petitioner undertakes to hand over physical possession of 14.08 guntas of land, more fully described in ANNEXUREA, in favour of Respondent No.5, subject to forthwith payment of the compensation amount of Rs.9,90,53,805/-, as determined in ANNEXURE-L by the Respondents No.1 to 4, towards acquisition of the said extent in Sy.No.75/1.

¶39

2.Furthermore, the Respondents No.1 to 4 undertake to pass an Award under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, within a period of three (3) months from the date of this Joint Memo.

¶40

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:15037 WP No. 6887 of 2026

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

3.The Petitioner and Respondents agree that, in the event the Petitioner is not satisfied with the Award so passed, the Petitioner shall be at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

¶43

WHEREFORE, the Petitioner and Respondents No.1 to 4 humbly pray that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose the top noted Writ Petition in terms of this Joint Memo, in the interest of justice and equity."

¶44

The joint memo filed by the petitioner and

¶45

respondent No.3 is taken on record.

¶46

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶47

the petitioner would adhere to the undertaking at para-1.

¶48

Taking note of the same, petition is disposed

¶49

of as not calling for adjudication while observing that the undertaking in the joint memo are to be strictly adhered to by both the parties.

¶50

Sd/(S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

¶51

MCR

M/S Trinayani Realtors Private Limited v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Trinayani Realtors Private Limited v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ca (India) Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax

M/S F R Steel Traders Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Smt Marigamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Ghati Subramanya Kshetra Development Authority Vs the Income Tax Officer

M/S. Maruthi Departmental Stores Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

M/S. Valente Lifespace Creators Pvt. Ltd., Vs Commercial Tax Officer