Dismissed¶33

Sri Rehaman Khan v. Authorized Officer

Karnataka HC4 Mar 2026WP/5403/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rehaman Khan and another v. Authorized Officer, The Malleswaram Co-operative Bank Ltd.; WP No. 5403 of 2022 (GM-DRT); SARFAESI Act 2002 (Act 54/2002) possession notice dated 26.10.2021 vide Annexure-A; writ under Articles 226 and 227 seeking certiorari; dismissed as infructuous on 04.03.2026 as entire loan amount paid and loan account closed; all I.A.s closed; bench: Lalitha Kanneganti J.; advocates: Saravanan G. (petitioners), K.V. Lokesh (bank).

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, recording the learned counsel for the respondent bank's submission that the entire amount has been paid by the petitioner and the loan account is closed, leaving nothing to be considered. ¶33

Sri Rehaman Khan Vs Authorized Officer — Banking and Recovery | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:13293 WP No. 5403 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 5403 OF 2022 (GM-DRT)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. REHAMAN KHAN

¶10

S/O LATE GHOUSE KHAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 34/1, 4^TH A CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, OLD GUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD,

¶11

BENGALURU -560 026

¶12

Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SMT. FARZANA W/O REHAMAN KHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 34/1, 4^TH A CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, OLD GUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 026

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI. SARAVANAN G., ADVOCATE)

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:13293 WP No. 5403 of 2022

HC-KAR

AND:

AUTHORIZED OFFICER

THE MALLESWARAM

CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., H.O.102, EAST PARK ROAD, 7^TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU- 560 003

¶23

…RESPONDENT

¶24

(BY SRI.K.V.LOKESH, ADVOCATE)

¶25

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED POSSESSION NOTICE DATED: 26.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK VIDE ANNEXURE-A UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SECRUTIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT. 2002 (ACT 54/2002) FOR ENFORCEMENT OF INTEREST IS EXCESSIVE, ILLEGAL AND UNSUSTAINABLE, AND SET ASIDE BY ISSUING THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI.

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:13293 WP No. 5403 of 2022

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

ORAL ORDER

¶32

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Bank submits that the entire amount is paid by the petitioner and the loan account is closed. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition.

¶33

Recording the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Bank, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .

¶34

i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.

¶35

SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

¶36

MEG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25

Sri Rehaman Khan v. Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Rehaman Khan v. Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Krishna D Vs Union of India

St. Johns Medical College Hospital Vs the Additional Deputy Commissioner

Smt. G R Padmashree Vs the Authorized Officer/ Chief Executive Officer

Sri Shafiulla Vs Dcb Bank Limited

Sri Balasubramanyam Vs the Authorized Officer and Manager

M/S Wobhillahi Vs Canara Bank