D. Venkanagowda v. Sri. B.K. Srinivasa Murthy
Case brief
What is this about?
A single-line order by the High Court of Karnataka extinguishing a writ petition where the respondent was granted permission to record a memo along with attached documents, which were taken on record.
What the court decided
WP NO. 5351/2013 (GM - RES)
CNR: KAHC010072412013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
[D. VENKANAGOWDA S/O RUDRAGOWD A VS. SRI. B.K. SRINIVASA MURTHY AND OTHERS]
15.09.2026
(VIDEO CONFERENCING / PHYSICAL HEARING)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has filed a memo dated 15.09.2026 seeking permission to produce, along with the memo, copies of the information furnished to the petitioners on 22.08.2019, 31.08.2019 and 12.09.2019.
The said memo is taken on record and the documents furnished therewith are also taken on record.
(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE
NBM List No:1 Sl No:15
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D. VENKANAGOWDA S/O RUDRAGOWD
- respondent
SRI. B.K. SRINIVASA MURTHY
Coram
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/5351/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court