Dismissed¶37

C Krishnappa v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Jun 2026WP/52823/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 52823 of 2019 (LB-BMP); C Krishnappa v. State of Karnataka, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike and Assistant Revenue Officer (West-Market); challenge to BBMP revenue notice dated 09.12.2019 (Annexure-C); decided 05.06.2026 by Justice B M Shyam Prasad; petition withdrawn by counsel's memo and dismissed as withdrawn; no merits decided, no precedent value; advocates: R. Kothwal (petitioner), Bopanna Belliappa AGA (State), Amit Deshpande (BBMP).

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petition as not pressed; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no substantive relief granted. ¶37

C Krishnappa Vs State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:26816 WP No. 52823 of 2019

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 52823 OF 2019 (LB-BMP)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

C KRISHNAPPA S/O CHANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, SHOP NO.59/C UPPER BASEMENT SKR MARKET BANGALORE-560002

¶10

R/O 59 SWASTHI MAIN ROAD, SHANTI NAGAR BANGALORE-560027

¶11

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N

¶12

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

(BY SRI. R. KOTHWAL, ADVOCATE)

¶14

…PETITIONER

¶15

AND:

¶16

STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT

¶17

AUTHORITY(MUNCIPALITIES AND URBAN

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:26816 WP No. 52823 of 2019

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES) ROOM NO.435 4TH FLOOR VIKASA SOUDHA VIDHANA VEEDHI BENGALURU-560 001

¶22

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE PALIKE OFFICES NARASIMHA RAJA SQUARE BENGALURU-560 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIOENR

¶23

THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER (WEST-MARKET) BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE PALIKE OFFICES NARASIMHA RAJA SQUARE BENGALURU-560 002

¶24

…RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R1;

¶26

SRI. AMIT DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)

¶27

THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 09.12.2019 ISSUED BY THE R-3 - ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BENGLAURU, TO THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-C.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:26816 WP No. 52823 of 2019

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶33

ORAL ORDER

¶34

The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed

¶35

a memo which reads as under.

¶36

" I, the undersigned counsel for the Petitioners herein submit that the Petitioners intend to withdraw the present Petition and accordingly the present Memo is being preferred. It is hence prayed that the same may be taken on record and allow the petitioner herein to withdraw the present petition as not pressed in the interest of justice."

¶37

The memo is accepted and the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶38

Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶39

C Krishnappa v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C Krishnappa v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri B Manjunatha Vs State of Karnataka

Sri N Chandrashekar Vs the Chief Commissioner

M/S Kmv Projects Limited Vs Karnataka Residential Educational Institutions Society

K Annayappa Vs the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Mr. v Guru Swagath Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Yashoda N Rai Vs the Commissioner