Disposed¶30

Smt. Saroja Biradar, v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (Bbmp)

Karnataka HC9 Jun 2026WP/5096/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC Bengaluru, WP 5096/2026 (LB-TAX), B M Shyam Prasad J, 09.06.2026; BBMP property-tax notice S.144(15)(e) BBMP Act dtd 28.12.2023 (ARO(BNS)/W-180/PR-53-2020-21); recovery order S.156 BBMP Act 2020 with Circular CH COMM/PSR/2281/23-24 cl.7(6)(3) dtd 07.06.2025; sale proclamation RO(PDN) W-180/JAN/2025-26/PRC006041 dtd 30.01.2026; Art. 226/227; petition disposed as infructuous as tax dues settled; no merits adjudication.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief granted; petition disposed of as having become infructuous upon counsel's submission that the municipal tax dues are settled. ¶30

Smt. Saroja Biradar, Vs Bruhat Bengaluru… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27438 WP No. 5096 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5096 OF 2026 (LB-TAX)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT. SAROJA BIRADAR, W/O. BIRADAR, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT 855, 61ST CROSS, 4TH BLOCK, EWS KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560078 (BENEFIT OF SENIOR CITIZEN NOT CLAIMED)

¶10

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

…PETITIONER

¶12

(BY MS. ANAGHA S DESAI.,ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE (BBMP) REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER N.R. SQUARE,

¶15

¶16

NC: 2026:KHC:27438 WP No. 5096 of 2026

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

BENGALURU 560002

¶19

THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BBMP, BANASHANKARI TEMPLE WARD ZONE BENGALURU 560070

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)

¶22

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD 28.12.2023 BEARING NO. ARO(BNS)/W-180/PR-53-2020-21 ISSUED UNDER SEC 144(15)(e) OF THE BBMP ACT BY THE RESPONDENTS AS PER ANNX-K; QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 07.06.2025 ISSUED UNDER PASSED UNDER SEC 156 BBMP ACT 2020 AN SUB CLAUSE 6(3) OF CLAUSE 7 OF CIRCULAR NO. CH COMM/PSR/2281/23-24 DTD 06.11.2023 BY THE RESPONDENTS AS PER ANNX-R; QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROCLAMATION AND WRITTEN NOTICE OF SALE OF IMMOVABLE PROPERTY BEARING NO. RO(PDN) W-180/JAN/2025-26/PRC006041 DTD 30.01.2026 AS PER ANNX-S.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶25

¶26

NC: 2026:KHC:27438 WP No. 5096 of 2026

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

Ms. Anagha S. Desai, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this Court may dispose of the petition as having become infructuous as the municipal tax dues are settled.

¶30

Taking this submission on record, the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.

¶31

Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶32

Smt. Saroja Biradar, v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (Bbmp)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Saroja Biradar, v. Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (Bbmp)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Guru Rajkumar Vs Mrs. Sridevi Byrappa

Kamalakara Naidu. v Vs B. N. Balakrishna

M/S S Balan Building Division Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.

Gvs Engineering and Construction, Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes

Basavaraj Shashikanth Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)

M/S Tumkur Rural and Urban Taluku Mspc., Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax.