Disposed¶28

Karnataka State Handicraft Development Corporation Limited v. Government of Karnataka

Karnataka HC15 Jun 2026WP/4922/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka HC writ petition WP 4922/2026 (L-RES) by Karnataka State Handicraft Development Corporation Ltd vs Government of Karnataka Department of Labor and B.V. Narasamma; filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; withdrawn at preliminary hearing 'B' group before Justice Jyoti M on 15-06-2026; disposed of as withdrawn on petitioner's memo with undertaking not to seek review or modification; pending interlocutory applications disposed of; no merits decision.

What did the court decide?

As counsel on record had taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. ¶28

Karnataka State Handicraft Development… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:28820 WP No. 4922 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 15^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 4922 OF 2026 (L-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

KARNATAKA STATE HANDICRAFT DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.45, 3RD FLOOR, KSHDC COMPLEX, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. A.R.VIVEK, ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. BY ITS ADDITIONAL SPECIAL OFFICER(DO-6).

¶14

Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶15

B.V.NARASAMMA, WIFE OF MANJUNATH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, NO.30, 7TH CROSS ROAD, SHIVANANDANAGAR, BENGALURU-560072.

¶16

…RESPONDENTS

¶17

(BY SRI. RAJAKUMAR M., AGA FOR R1; S.B.SIDDESWARASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:28820 WP No. 4922 of 2026

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Sri.A.R.Vivek., counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Rajakumar.M., Additional Government Advocate for

¶25

respondent No.1 and Sri.S.B.Siddeswara Swamy., counsel for respondent No.2 appeared in person.

¶26

Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be disposed of as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. Counsel, therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the writ petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.

¶27

The oral submission and the memo is placed on record.

¶28

As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:28820 WP No. 4922 of 2026

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

Because of disposal of the Writ Petition, all pending

¶33