Mrs Nirmala K v. the Bharath Co. Operative Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka HC (Bengaluru), Justice Lalitha Kanneganti, WP No. 4912 of 2023 (GM-RES), decided 18-03-2026, dismissed as infructuous. Petitioners: Nirmala K, Jayachandra C.M., Jayashree C.M. (counsel Rama Moorthy B.V.). Respondents: Bharath Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its Authorized Officer/Manager (counsel Ganesh H. Kempanna). Subject: writ of certiorari under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India, seeking quashing of Authorized Officer's notice dated 15.11.2022, Ref. No. BCB/033/2022-23, Annexure-C. Disposition based solely on counsel's infructuousness submission; pending IAs closed; no merits ruling on the notice.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission and the prayer to quash the impugned notice was not adjudicated on merits. All pending IAs, if any, ordered closed.