Disposed¶53

C. Sreedharan v. Smt. Papamma

Karnataka HC2 Mar 2026WP/48822/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Article 227 writ petition disposed of as not surviving in view of interim order in MFA No.6884/2025; challenge to order dated 24.9.2019 in IA No.III, FDP No.118/2012 (CCH-76, Bangalore) left undecided with all contentions kept open; background: ex parte decree in O.S.No.5770/1996, Misc.P.No.382/2013 rejected.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was disposed of with all contentions kept open ¶53

Why is it important?

C. Sreedharan Vs Smt. Papamma — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:12704 W.P. No.48822/2019

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.48822/2019 (GM-CPC)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

C. SREEDHARAN SINCE DEAD BY LR'S.

¶9

Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

SMT. K.P. KAMALAMMA W/O LATE C. SREEDHARAN AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT. CHERIYADTH HOUSE POST IRIMBALASSERI VIA NELLAYA, PALKKAD DISTRICT KERALA STATE.

¶11

REP. BY THEIR G.P.A. HOLDER SRI. C. PRAMOD S/O SRI. C. GOPALAN AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS NO.153, 5TH CROSS SIDDAPURA, 1ST BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 004.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY MS. KRUTIKA RAGHAVAN, ADV.,)

¶14

AND:

¶15

SMT. PAPAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY LR'S.

¶16

P. RAJASHEKHAR S/O LATE PUTTAPPA

¶17

¶18

NC: 2026:KHC:12704 W.P. No.48822/2019

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT. DODDATHOGURU VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI

¶21

BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.

¶22

P. RAMESH S/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.26 OM SHANTHI NILAYA 1ST CROSS, LAKSHMI LAYOUT MUNNEKOLALA MAIN ROAD MARATHAHALLI POST BENGALURU-560 037.

¶23

RADHA .P D/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS RESIDING AT: HOODI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BENGLAURU EAST TALUK.

¶24

P. BABU S/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT. DODDA THOGURU VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.

¶25

ANUSUYA .P D/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT. BELLANDUR VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK.

¶26

ROOPA .P D/O LATE PUTTAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT. ELECTRONIC CITY SHIKARIPALYA MAIN ROAD

¶27

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:12704 W.P. No.48822/2019

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU DISTRICT.

¶30

SRI. VENKATAPPA S/O THIMMAREDDY SINCE DECEASED BY LR'S.

¶31

SMT. V. NANJAMMA D/O LATE VENKATAPPA W/O M.R. GURUMURTHY REDDY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS.

¶32

SRI. V. NAGARAJU S/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.

¶33

SMT. V. YASHODA D/O LATE VENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.

¶34

RESPONDENTS 7 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT NO.4 BHARATH REGENCY CAMLIN INFRASTRUCTURE, ANANDNAGAR MARATHHALLI, BANGALORE-560 037.

¶35

SRI. THIMMA REDDY S/O VENKATAPPA, MAJOR R/AT. MARATHAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

¶36

SMT. JAYALAKSHMAMMA W/O RAGHURAMAREDDY, MAJOR RESIDING AT HOODI VILLAGE K.R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK.

¶37

…RESPONDENTS

¶38

(BY SRI. G.A. VISWANATHA REDDY, ADV., FOR R1 TO R6 R7 TO R11 SERVED)

¶39

¶40

NC: 2026:KHC:12704 W.P. No.48822/2019

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 24.9.2019, PASSED IN FDP NO.118 OF 2012 PENDING ON THE FILE OF LXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-76) BANGALORE IN IA NO.III ANNX-A & ETC.

¶43

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶44

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL

¶45

ORAL ORDER

¶46

This petition is filed seeking for the following relief:

¶47

"Set aside the order dated 24.9.2019, passed in FDP No.118 of 2012 pending on the file of LXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge (CCH-76) Bangalore in IA No.III Annexure-A."

¶48

Miss Krutika Raghavan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed in FDP No.118/2012. It is further submitted that an ex parte judgment and decree came to be passed against the petitioner in O.S.No.5770/1996 which was challenged in Misc.P.No.382/2013. However, the said miscellaneous also came to be rejected. Being aggrieved, the petitioner

¶49

¶50

NC: 2026:KHC:12704 W.P. No.48822/2019

¶51

HC-KAR

¶52

has filed MFA No.6884/2025 and the co-ordinate Bench of this Court has considered the case of the petitioner and granted the interim order. It is also submitted that in view of the said interim order, the present petition does not survive for adjudication. The said submission is placed on record.

¶53

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. All

¶54

the contentions raised in this petition are kept open.

¶55

Sd/(VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE

¶56

¶57

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53

C. Sreedharan v. Smt. Papamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

C. Sreedharan v. Smt. Papamma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Kemparaju Vs Sri M R Rajath

Sri. Sridhar Alias S. Sridhar Vs Smt. Kumudha

Sri Anjina Reddy Vs Sri K Mohan Raju

Sri Pranesh Bhat Vs Sri Kishor Kumar

Sri Sundarappa Vs Smt Lakshmi Sadanandan

Smt. Sreelatha R Vs the Manager