Sri Sadananda v. the Deputy Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Disposal by memo; WP 4743 of 2022 (KLR-RES); High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru; Judge R Devdas; decided 25.02.2026; petitioners Sadananda, Devaki, Amitha, Chandrashekar, Sunil, Sudesh, Sanath, Chandappa Poojary of Thiruvail Village, Mangaluru Taluk, D.K. District; respondents Deputy Commissioner Mangaluru, Assistant Commissioner Mangaluru, Thasildar Mangaluru Taluk, Mario Peres Bhatt; sought quashing of Deputy Commissioner order dtd. 4.1.2022 (Annexure-J) and Assistant Commissioner order dtd. 30.10.2018 (Annexure-C); filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; disposed of in terms of counsel's memo dtd. 24.02.2026 on the strength of W.P.No.14613/2022 (confirmed in Writ Appeal No.999/2022) and W.P.No.3788/2025; advocates Roopesha B (petitioners), V. Seshu HCGP (R1-R3), Abhishek Marla (R4); no quantum, no substantive relief adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
The memo dated 24.02.2026 filed by learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.