Dismissed¶¶32

Zoomcar India Pvt. Ltd. v. Manish Kumar

Karnataka HC23 Jun 2026WP/4685/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Zoomcar India Pvt. Ltd.; Manish Kumar; Additional Labour Commissioner (Industrial Relations); Karnataka High Court; WP No. 4685 of 2020 (L-RES); writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; Justice Jyoti M; pending interlocutory applications disposed; NC: 2026:KHC:31149; decision dated 23 June 2026.

What did the court decide?

As the counsel on record had taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ¶¶32

Zoomcar India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Manish Kumar — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:31149 WP No. 4685 of 2020

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 4685 OF 2020 (L-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

ZOOMCAR INDIA PVT. LTD., UNIT NOS.701 TO 717 7TH FLOOR, TOWER-B, DIAMOND DISTRICT NO.150, AIRPORT ROAD, KODIHALLI, BENGALURU-560008. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MR. GREGORY BRADFORD MORAN (ALIAS GREG MORAN)

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SMT. GEETHIKA M.A., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SHRISTI WIDGE, ADVOCATE)

¶12

Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

AND:

¶14

MANISH KUMAR, S/O. BRIJENDRA KUMAR SINGH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDING AT 18, THAYIL, 6TH MAIN, WASA LAYOUT, DODDENAKUNDI, BENGALURU-560037.

¶15

ADDITIONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER, (INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS) KARMIKA BHAVAN, BANNERGHATTA ROAD,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:31149 WP No. 4685 of 2020

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

NEAR DAIRY CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560029.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SRI. GANAPATHI HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. K.P.YOGANNA, AGA FOR R2)

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Smt.Geethika M.A., counsel on behalf of Smt.Shristi

¶26

Widge, for the petitioner appeared in person.

¶27

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order.

¶28

The oral submission is placed on record.

¶29

¶30

NC: 2026:KHC:31149 WP No. 4685 of 2020

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶33

Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.

¶34

SD/(JYOTI M) JUDGE

¶35

¶36

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20

Zoomcar India Pvt. Ltd. v. Manish Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Zoomcar India Pvt. Ltd. v. Manish Kumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Gramox Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs State of Karnataka

The State of Karnataka Vs Sri Dasaiah

M R Jagadamba Vs the Managing Director

Sri. B. N. Subraya Vs the Authorized Officer/

Mrs Didar Nazima Vs Axis Bank Limited

Sri Doddakalappa Vs Smt S Sheela