Praveen K P Vs the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited

¶1

1 -

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:18158 WP No. 4441 of 2026

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1^ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 4441 OF 2026 (S-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

PRAVEEN K. P., S/O PATALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/A KALAGADDE STREET, KURUGAL VILLAGE AND POST, VEMAGAL HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR – 563 157.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. Y.R. SADASHIVAREDDY, SR. COUNSEL APPEARING FOR SRI. RAHUL S. REDDY, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

THE KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LIMITED REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SHAKTI BHAVAN, NO.82, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.

¶14

THE KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SAMPIGE ROAD, 18^TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU – 560 003.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, ADVOCATE GENERAL & SR. COUNSEL APPEARING FOR SRI. AJAY J. NANDALIKE, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. N. K. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶17

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO RECALCULATE THE FINAL SCORE LIST

¶18

2 -

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:18158 WP No. 4441 of 2026

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

PUBLISHED ON 07/01/2026 ONE MARK VIDE ANNEXURE-G, AS PER THE NEGATIVE MARKING DEDUCTION FOR EVERY THREE WRONG ANSWERS (1/3RD), AND PUBLISH THE SAME IN SO FAR PETITIONERS CONCERN AND ETC.,

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

In this petition, petitioner seeks for the following reliefs:-

¶26

“a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus by directing the Respondents to recalculate the Final score List published on 07.01.2026 vide Annexure – G, as per the negative marking – One mark deduction for every three wrong answers (1/3^rd ) and publish the same in so far petitioner concern.

¶27

b) Issue Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or order or direction directing the respondents to select the petitioner and appoint him to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the service of the respondent No.1, and grant him all the consequential benefits.

¶28

c) Grant such other reliefs that this Hon’ble Court deems fit to be grant in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of Justice and Equity.”

¶29

Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner,

¶30

learned Advocate General and Senior Counsel for the respondent

¶31

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:18158 WP No. 4441 of 2026

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

No.1 and learned counsel for respondent No.3 and perused the material on record.

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition may be disposed of directing respondent No.1 to consider the petitioner to be selected and appointed to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the service of respondent No.1 by taking the marks of the petitioner as 61 and take appropriate decision/pass appropriate orders in this regard as expeditiously as possible.

¶35

Per contra, learned Advocate General and Senior Counsel for the respondent submits that if reasonable time is granted, they would consider the request and take appropriate decision / pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time.

¶36

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to dispose of the petition by issuing certain directions. In the result, I pass the following:

¶37

ORDER

¶38

4 -

¶39

NC: 2026:KHC:18158 WP No. 4441 of 2026

¶40

HC-KAR

¶41

i) The petition is hereby disposed of.

¶42

ii) Respondent No.1 is hereby directed to consider the request of the petitioner for selection and appointment to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the service of respondent No.1 by taking the marks secured by the petitioner as 61, if he is otherwise entitled to, and take appropriate decision/pass appropriate orders in this regard in accordance with law within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶43

Sd/(S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

¶44

MDS

¶45

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44

Praveen K P v. the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Praveen K P v. the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Leelavathi Vs the State of Karnataka

Dr G Rajashekara Vs Principal Accountant General

L Mahadeva Vs Coconut Development Board

Sri. Arun Kumar L.S Vs the Principal Secretory

Venkatesh H. Vs the State of Karnataka

Srikante Gowda Vs D M Marigowda