Dismissed¶27

Smt Usha Ramnani v. State Bank of India

Karnataka HC10 Feb 2026WP/4165/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Usha Ramnani v. State Bank of India PBB Koramangala Branch & Directorate of Enforcement; WP No.4165 of 2021 (GM-RES); HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7724; dismissed as withdrawn 10-02-2026; debit freezing of bank account No.10209777124; communication dated 22.05.2020; Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India; Enforcement Directorate Bangalore; counsel Kiran J., B.N. Tulsi Kumar, P. Karunakar; bench M.G.S. Kamal J.; withdrawal memo; no merits adjudicated.

What the court decided

AI extract

Smt Usha Ramnani Vs State Bank of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

1 - NC: 2026:KHC:7724 WP No. 4165 of 2021

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO.4165 OF 2021 (GM-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT USHA RAMNANI W/O MR.VINOD RAMNANI, AGED AOUT 62 YEARS, NO.115, KASAVANAHALLI, SARJAPUR ROAD, VARTHUR, BENGALURU – 35.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. KIRAN J.,ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

STATE BANK OF INDIA PBB KORMANGALA BRANCH, 80 FEET ROAD, 4^TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE- 560 034. REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANGER. 2. THE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, 3^RD FLOOR, “B” BLOCK, BMTC, SHANTHINAGAR, TTMC, K.H. ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027, REPRESENTED BY JOINT DIRECTOR, BANGALORE ZONE.

¶13

…RESPONDENTS

¶14

(BY SRI.B.N.TULSI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1, SRI.P.KARUNAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶15

¶16

NC: 2026:KHC:7724 WP No. 4165 of 2021

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTILCES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH COMMUNICATION DATED 22.05.2020 FOR DEBIT FREEZING OF THE ACCOUNT NO.10209777124 MAINTAINED WITH THE R-1 BANK ANNEXURE-A. AND ETC.,

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶20

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking

¶23

withdrawal of the petition which reads as under :

¶24

“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶25

The Counsel for the Petitioner on instructions from the client, respectfully submits that the above matter may be permitted to be withdrawn, as the client does not wish to prosecute the same any further. It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above case as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶26

The memo is taken on record.

¶27

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶29

CKL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28

Smt Usha Ramnani v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Smt Usha Ramnani v. State Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Jyothi Basavaraj Mundalamane Vs Sri. Kashinath

Sri.P.Madhav Rao Vs the Karnataka Stae Bar Council

Mr.Prakash Sapaliga Vs M/S Indian Over Seas Bank

Sri Balaraju Vs the State of Karnataka

M/S Canadian International School Private Limited Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Smt Pooja Maruthi Vs the Management of