Kumari Kiran Vinod v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition under Articles 226 and 227, Constitution of India, seeking declaration of lapse of BDA land acquisition under Section 24(2), Right of Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (Central Act No.30 of 2013), concerning Site No.11, Juhula Road, Kammanahalli (Kachakaranahalli), Bangalore North Taluk; preliminary notification 21.03.1977 (Annexure-G), final notification 14.05.1980 (Annexure-H), possession mahazar 24.10.1986 (Annexure-J), award 24.10.1986 in L.A. Case No.616/1980-81 (Annexure-K). DISPOSED WITHOUT MERITS: dismissed for non-prosecution owing to absence of petitioner's counsel (Rama Moorthy B.V.) on two consecutive hearing dates; bench: R. Nataraj, J.; decision date 22.06.2026. Not citable for Section 24(2) lapse jurisprudence; relevant only as an instance of dismissal for non-representation.
What did the court decide?
There was no representation for the petitioner on the date of hearing, nor was there any representation on the last date of hearing.