Dismissed¶38

Mr Saleem Tangal Kader Palkad v. the Authorized Officer

Karnataka HC6 Jan 2026WP/39018/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 39018 of 2025 (GM-DRT); NC: 2026:KHC:411; Ashok S. Kinagi, J.; decision 06-01-2026. Petitioner Saleem Tangal Kader Palkad vs Authorized Officer, Canara Bank ARM Branch Manipal and others. Withdrawal of writ petition challenging bank possession notice dated 12/11/2025; liberty to approach DRT; 30-day non-precipitation direction; DRT directed not to insist on limitation, to hear on merits; Articles 226 and 227; interim protection; memo for withdrawal taken on record.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the DRT; respondents directed not to precipitate the matter for 30 days; if an appeal is filed before the DRT, the DRT is not to insist upon the limitation point and is to proceed on merits. ¶38

Mr Saleem Tangal Kader Palkad Vs the Authorized… — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:411 WP No. 39018 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 39018 OF 2025 (GM-DRT)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

MR. SALEEM TANGAL KADER PALKAD S/O THANGAL KADER PALKAD, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDING AT FLAT NO. 701, HIMALAYA PRESTIGE,

¶11

KUNJIBETTU,

¶12

UDUPI 576102

¶13

Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

(BY SRI. KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR L., ADVOCATE)

¶15

…PETITIONER

¶16

AND:

¶17

THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER

¶18

CANARA BANK ARM BRANCH, ARM BRANCH MANIPAL, SRD BUILDING,

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:411 WP No. 39018 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

NEAR HEAD OFFICE ANNEX (MANIPAL)

¶23

UDUPI-576104

¶24

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, ARM BRANCH MANIPAL, HEAD OFFICE 576 104

¶25

CHIEF MANAGER/DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, CANARA BANK, TOWN BRANCH, UDUPI-576104

¶26

…RESPONDENTS

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED 12/11/2025 VIDE NO. 641/ARM/7280/2025-26, ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO 1, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 02/09/2025, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE -E, WITHIN A TIME BOUND PERIOD.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶29

¶30

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:411 WP No. 39018 of 2025

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶34

ORAL ORDER

¶35

Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal (‘DRT’ for short) and seeks interim protection for a period of 30 days.

¶36