Dismissed

Sri G M Hemanth v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC17 Sept 2026WP/38236/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners, members and ex-directors of a milk producers' cooperative society, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution. At the preliminary hearing, counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, confirming a conscious decision not to seek review or modification. The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and disposed of all pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; all pending interlocutory applications disposed of.

Sri G M Hemanth Vs the State of Karnataka — Cooperative Societies | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

HC-KAR

¶3

NC: 2026:KHC:50889 WP No. 38236 of 2025

¶4

CNR: KAHC010828952025

¶5

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶6

DATED THIS THE 17^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026

¶7

BEFORE

¶8

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 38236 OF 2025 (CS-RES)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

SRI. G.M.HEMANTH, S/O. SRI. MUNIKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,

¶11

SRI. G.V.SRIRAMAPPA, S/O. SRI. VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,

¶12

SRI. PAPAREDDY G.S., S/O. SRI. SUBBAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

¶13

Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

SRI. KYATAPPA G.V., S/O. SRI. S.VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

¶15

SRI. VENKATARAYAPPA G.N., S/O. SRI. NAGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

¶16

SMT. BHARATHAMMA, W/O. SRI. J.P.SATHYANARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

¶17

ALL ARE R/AT S.GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, AVALAGURKI (P), CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101. (THE ALL PETITIONERS BEING MEMBERS AND EX-DIRECTORS OF S.GOLLAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,

¶18

¶19

HC-KAR

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:50889 WP No. 38236 of 2025

¶21

CNR: KAHC010828952025

¶22

S.GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, AVALAGURKI (P), CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101.

¶23

…PETITIONERS

¶24

(BY SMT. VIDYASHREE K.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHOWDAREDDY T.M., ADVOCATE)

¶25

AND:

¶26

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶27

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, UNDER SECRETARY-3, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

¶28

THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHIKKABALLAPURA DIVISION, D.C. OFFICE COMPLEX, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101.

¶29

THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, CHIKKABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION/ ELECTION OFFICER, NH - 44, CHITRAVATHI, CHIKKABALLAPURA-562101.

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:50889 WP No. 38236 of 2025

¶32

¶33

CNR: KAHC010828952025

¶34

S.GOLLAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., S.GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, AVALAGURKI (P) CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101, BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, (THE SOCIETY IS REGISTERED UNDER THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT 1959)

¶35

SRI. CHANNAPPA, S/O. SRI. VENKATARAYAPPA, AGED MAJOR, ( NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONERS) GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, AVALAGURKI POST, CHIKKABALLAPURA TALUK AND DISTRICT-562101.

¶36

…RESPONDENTS

¶37

(BY SRI. YOGESH D.NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED, SRI. DEVIPRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R6)

¶38

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.

¶39

THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

¶40

¶41

HC-KAR

¶42

NC: 2026:KHC:50889 WP No. 38236 of 2025

¶43

CNR: KAHC010828952025

¶44

ORAL ORDER

¶45

Smt.Vidyashree K.S., counsel for Sri.Chowda Reddy T.M., for the petitioners and Sri.Yogesh D.Naik, Additional Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 appeared in person.

¶46

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioners submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioners shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order.

¶47

The oral submission is placed on record.

¶48

As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶49

¶50

HC-KAR

¶51

NC: 2026:KHC:50889 WP No. 38236 of 2025

¶52

CNR: KAHC010828952025

¶53

Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending

¶54

interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.

¶55

Sd/(JYOTI M) JUDGE

¶56

SS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 43

Sri G M Hemanth v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri G M Hemanth v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases