Renuka T M Vs the Senior Regional Manager

THE SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER THE HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD., HUBLI LPG REGIONAL OFFICE PB NO.24, PLOT NO.165/166 KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, BELUR, DHARWAD-580011.

¶13

…RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS AS DIRECT TO THE RESPONDENT COMPANY AS WHERE THE PUBLIC CONCERN PROGRAM IS ONGOING CATEGORY WISE AND WHILE THE CATEGORICAL PERSONS ARE NOT AVAILABLE OR THEY HAS NO INTEREST OF ESTABLISHMENT OF PROGRAM OR THEY HASN'T ACCOMMODATION, THEN THE COMPANY HAS MODIFICATION

¶14

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:14981 WP No. 378 of 2026

¶15

HC-KAR

¶16

OF THE CATEGORY OR GIVING THE PROGRAM TO ANOTHER ELIGIBLE PERSON, FOR PROTECT THE PUBLIC INTEREST., AND ETC.

¶17

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶18

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶19

ORAL ORDER

¶20

The captioned petition is filed seeking the following

¶21

reliefs:

¶22

"i. Issue a writ of mandamus as direct to the respondent company as where the public concern program is ongoing category wise and while the categorical person are not available or they has no interest of establishment of program or they hasn't accommodation, then the company has modification of the category or giving the program to another eligible person, for protect the public interest.

¶23

ii. Pass any other order as this Hon'ble court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case including an order as to costs in the interest of justice and equity."

¶24

On perusal of the reliefs sought in the captioned

¶25

petition, this Court finds that the prayers are couched in

¶26

broad and general terms. The petitioner seeks a direction

¶27

to the respondent company to modify the category of a program or allot the program to other eligible persons in

¶28

3 -

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:14981 WP No. 378 of 2026

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

situations where the originally identified category persons are unavailable or unwilling. The reliefs as framed do not disclose any specific legal injury suffered by the petitioner nor do they indicate infringement of any legally enforceable right of the petitioner. In substance, the prayers seek issuance of general directions in the nature of public interest, which cannot be entertained in a petition of the present nature.

¶32

In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition. Accordingly, the captioned petition stands dismissed . However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies in accordance with law, if so advised.

¶33

Sd/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE

¶34

HDK

¶35

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38

Renuka T M v. the Senior Regional Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Renuka T M v. the Senior Regional Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Mohammed Khaleel Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Arti Panja Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt.Sunanda Vs State of Karnataka

The Manager Vs K Thimmaiah

M/S B H Gangadharachar Contractor Vs State of Karnataka

Sri.Ananthakumar Vs State of Karnataka