Dismissed¶41

M/S Mondo Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. the Chief Commissioner

Karnataka HC25 Jun 2026WP/3775/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 3775 of 2025 (LB-BMP); M/s Mondo Builders Pvt Ltd v. Chief Commissioner BBMP & others incl. M/s N.D. Developers Pvt Ltd; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's memo (not pressed); subject matter: BBMP modified plan sanction application dated 03.06.2022 (PRJ/0333/22-23) and confirmation orders dated 01.01.2025 (BBMP/AEE/37, 38, 39 of 2024-25); no merits decided, no cases cited; Judge: B M Shyam Prasad; date of order: 25.06.2026.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the petitioner's memo and no directions were issued. ¶41

M/S Mondo Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Chief Commissioner — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:31664 WP No. 3775 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 3775 OF 2025 (LB-BMP)

¶9

BETWEEN:

¶10

M/S MONDO BUILDERS PVT LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT GPR TOWERS

¶11

NO. 6, PARK ROAD TASKER TOWN BENGALURU 560051 REP BY ITS DIRECTOR MR AVINASH AGARWAL.

¶12

…PETITIONER

¶13

(BY SRI. AKASH V T.,ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N

¶16

Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶17

THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU PALIKE N R SQUARE, BANGALORE 560002.

¶18

ZONAL COMMISSIONER WHITEFIELD SUB DIVISION MAHADEVAPURA ZONE BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BANGALORE 560056.

¶19

¶20

NC: 2026:KHC:31664 WP No. 3775 of 2025

¶21

HC-KAR

¶22

ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WHITEFIELD SUB DIVISION MAHADEVAPURA ZONE BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BANGALORE 560066.

¶23

ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING WHITEFIELD SUB DIVISION MAHADEVAPURA ZONE BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BANGALORE 560066.

¶24

M/S N. D. DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.398, 1^ST FLOOR, 7^TH CROSS, MICO LAYOUT, B T M II STAGE, BENGALURU -560076, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MR. M.K.K. DURANI.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SRI. MONESH KUMAR K B., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. P. CHINNAPPA., ADVOCATE FOR R5)

¶27

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 AND R-4 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION DATED 03.06.2022 BEARING NO. PRJ/0333/22-23 (BBMP/AD.COM/MDP/0156/22-23 FOR MODIFIED

¶28

¶29

NC: 2026:KHC:31664 WP No. 3775 of 2025

¶30

HC-KAR

¶31

PLAN SANCTION MADE BY THE PETITIONER WITHIN A PERIOD OF 15 DAYS VIDE ANNX-A; DIRECTION BY DECLARING THAT THE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AS PER ANNX-A IS DEEMED TO BE APPROVED AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE R-2 AND 4 TO COLLECT FEE FOR THE PLAN SANCTION; QUASH THE FOLLOWING ORDERS. i. CONFIRMATION ORDER DATED 01.01.2025 BEARING NO. BBMP/AEE/37/202425 PASSED BY R-3 VIDE ANNX-B; ii. CONFIRMATION ORDER DATED 01.01.2025 BEARING NO. BBMP/AEE/38/2024-25 PASSED BY R-3 VIDE ANNX-B1; iii. CONFIRMATION ORDER DATED 01.01.2025 BEARING NO. BBMP/AEE/39/2024-25 PASSED BY R-3 VIDE ANNX-B-2 AND ETC.

¶32

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶33

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶34

¶35

NC: 2026:KHC:31664 WP No. 3775 of 2025

¶36

HC-KAR

¶37

ORAL ORDER

¶38

Sri Akash V T, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the writ petition which reads as under.

¶39

“The Counsel for Petitioner submits that, the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present writ petition and the petitioner has communicated the same though his email and has instructed the undersigned counsel to withdraw the present writ petition. In view of the said instructions received from the petitioner, the present memo is being filed seeking dismissal of the writ petition as not pressed and the same may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity.”

¶40

The memo is accepted, and the writ petition

¶41

stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶42

SD/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶43

AN/-

M/S Mondo Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. the Chief Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Mondo Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. the Chief Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baburengan Mahendran Vs the Additional Commissioner of Central Tax

Smt Nisarga M Gowda Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (AUDIT)-2.6

Mr Subash Vs Joint Commissioner

M/S Nayan and Patel Automobiles Vs Greater Bengaluru Authority

Sri K Halesh Vs the Greater Bengaluru Authority

M/S Empire Industries Limited Vs the Union of India