Disposed¶38

Mrs. Sharanya v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC2 Mar 2026WP/37335/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 37335 of 2025 (LA-KIADB), High Court of Karnataka, decided 02-03-2026, S Sunil Dutt Yadav J. Writ petition (Articles 226/227) against KIADB/Special Land Acquisition Officer notice dated 08-08-2025 under Section 28(2) Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act 1966 (Annexure-A, Ref. KIADB/K.R.I.D.E/BHOOSWA/C4/17/080-180/DODDANEKUNDI/2/2025-26); petitioner title holder via gift deed dated 18.01.2023 not named in RTC; petition disposed of with direction to Respondent No.3 to consider Annexure-J representation and pass orders within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 directed to consider the petitioner's representation at Annexure-J and pass appropriate orders within four weeks of receipt of certified copy of the order; petition disposed of accordingly. ¶38

Mrs. Sharanya v Vs the State of Karnataka — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:12541 WP No. 37335 of 2025

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 37335 OF 2025 (LA-KIADB)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

MRS. SHARANYA V., AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, W/O AGNISHWAIR, RESIDING AT NO.162, CKB LAYOUT, MUNNEKOLALA EXTENSION, MARATHAHALLI POST, BANGALORE 560037.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. LEELARAJU M. N., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.

¶15

THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL-AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD (KIADB), REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER-AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER, O/T NO. 49, 4^TH AND 5^TH FLOOR, EAST WING, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560001.

¶16

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:12541 WP No. 37335 of 2025

¶17

HC-KAR

¶18

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KIADB, O/T NO.14/3, ARAVIND BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001.

¶19

THE TAHSILDAR, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, O/T 2M3R+WR5, DIESEL LOCO SHED ROAD, DURAVANI NAGAR, KRISHNARAJAPURAM, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 56003.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SMT. YASHODHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R4; SRI. GOPAL V. BILALMANE, ADV. FOR R2 AND R3)

¶22

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

¶23

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 08-08-2025 BEARING REF. NO. KIADB/K.R.I.D.E/BHOOSWA/C4/17/080-180/DODDANEKUNDI/ 2/2025-26 (ANNEXURE- A) ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3, IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC.,

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶26

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:12541 WP No. 37335 of 2025

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts

¶30

notice for respondents No.1 and 4. Learned counsel Sri. Gopal V. Bilalmane accepts notice for respondents No.2 and 3.

¶31

The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to set aside the notice dated 08.08.2025 at Annexure-A which is a notice issued under Section 28(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has obtained rights through gift deed dated 18.01.2023, notice is issued by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) only to those whose name is entered in the RTC and who are the previous vendors. It is submitted that the petitioner's representation at Annexure-J may be directed to be considered and the petitioner be heard as well.

¶33

4 - NC: 2026:KHC:12541 WP No. 37335 of 2025

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent - KIADB submits that representation at Annexure-J would be considered and appropriate decision would be taken insofar as the petitioner's representation at Annexure-J.

¶36

Such representation is directed to be considered as the counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner being the title holder as on the date of preliminary notification requires to be heard in the proceedings.

¶37

Accordingly, respondent No.3 is directed to consider the representation at Annexure-J and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

¶38

Accordingly, petition is disposed of in terms of

¶39

the above.

¶40

SD/(S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE

¶41

MCR

Mrs. Sharanya v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Sharanya v. Vs the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Madhusudhan Akkara Veetil Vs Zephyr Peacock India Growth Fund

Sri Narayanabovi Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri R Anup Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Sri a Udaykumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Dharamendra Bothra, Vs Bangalore Development Authority

Sri. Mylarappa Vs the State of Karnataka