Disposed

Sri.a.S.Mani @ a.Susai Mani v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC12 Jun 2026WP/37245/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner approached High Court to quash endorsement initiating illegal entry verification. Court noted lack of action despite Ministerial direction and quashed endorsement, directing authorities to complete proceedings within six months.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of; Respondents directed to conduct phodi and durasth proceedings within six months.

Sri.a.S.Mani @ a.Susai Mani Vs the State of Karnataka — Karnataka HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:28481 WP No. 37245 of 2025

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.37245 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. A.S.MANI @ A. SUSAI MANI S/O. LATE ANTONY CRUZ @ ANJNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT NO.2/2, 1^ST CROSS, B.S.A. ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560005.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. NARASIMHARAJU, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560 001.

¶15

THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU-560064.

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:28481 WP No. 37245 of 2025

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

THE TAHSILDAR, O/O. THE TAHSILDAR, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU-560064.

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA )

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 18.01.2025 ISSUED BY THE 4^TH RESPONDENT BEARING NO.LND/NA/CR/222/2015-16 AS PER ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶27

In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to conducting phodi and durasth proceedings in respect of the land belonging

¶28

to the petitioner pursuant to the representation dated

¶29

10.11.2025 produced at Annexure-M. The petitioner

¶30

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:28481 WP No. 37245 of 2025

¶31

HC-KAR

¶32

has, inter-alia, sought quashing of the Endorsement dated 18.01.2025 produced at Annexure-A issued by respondent No. 4.

¶33

Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and upon careful consideration of the Endorsement dated 18.01.2025 (Annexure-A), it is seen that respondent No.4 has stated that, on the instructions of the Hon'ble Minister for Revenue, as there are certain illegal entries alleged to have been made in several lands situated in Yelahanka Taluk, the Regional Commissioner, Bengaluru Division, was directed to verify the same and take an appropriate decision in the matter.

¶34

A perusal of the writ petition indicates that the said direction was issued by the Hon'ble Minister for Revenue prior to the issuance of the Endorsement

¶35

¶36

NC: 2026:KHC:28481 WP No. 37245 of 2025

¶37

HC-KAR

¶38

dated 18.01.2025 (Annexure-A). However, no action has been taken against the petitioner till date, and the petitioner is unaware as to when the respondentauthorities propose to take action in the matter.

¶39

In this regard, the learned Additional Government Advocate has placed on record a letter dated 18.05.2026 addressed by respondent No. 4 to respondent No.2 requesting that an enquiry be conducted by the Regional Commissioner. However, the petitioner has neither received any notice nor any intimation regarding such enquiry from the respondents.

¶40

In that view of the matter, if no action is initiated and concluded against the petitioner in respect of the subject land within an outer limit of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, it shall be presumed that no proceedings

¶41

5 - NC: 2026:KHC:28481 WP No. 37245 of 2025

¶42

HC-KAR

¶43

are contemplated against the petitioner in relation to the subject land. Consequently, respondent Nos. 3 and 4 are directed to conduct phodi and durasth proceedings in respect of the subject land within an outer limit of six months, thereafter, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the writ petition

¶44

stands disposed of .

¶45

In view of the disposal of the main petition,

¶46

pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

¶47

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶48

¶49

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Sri.a.S.Mani @ a.Susai Mani v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.a.S.Mani @ a.Susai Mani v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Narasingappa Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Sri. Murthy N Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Sukumar N Rao Vs the Assistant Director of

Chinnaswamy Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Sriramappa Vs the State of Karnataka

H. P. Basavaraju Vs the State of Karnataka