Smt Rekha v. Union Bank of India

Karnataka HC28 Jan 2026WP/36007/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru; WP No. 36007 of 2024 (GM-RES); Smt Rekha v. Union Bank of India & Others; decision dated 28-01-2026; writ petition challenging order of Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Davanagere in CRL MISC-321/2024 (Schedule A-1 property) dismissed as withdrawn on a memo of settlement; no merits adjudication, no ratio on the underlying dispute; no precedents cited or discussed.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn pursuant to the memo filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating the matter has been settled. ¶35-36

Smt Rekha Vs Union Bank of India — Writ and Judicial Review | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:4758 WP No. 36007 of 2024

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 28^TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 36007 OF 2024 (GM-RES)

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT REKHA W/O. SIDDESHWARA B B AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO 810/4 1ST STAGE, 2ND MAIN 3RD CROSS SHIVAKUMARA SWAMY BADAVANE DAVANAGERE 577002

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

(BY SRI. M. R. HIREMATHAD, ADVOCATE)

¶13

AND:

¶14

UNION BANK OF INDIA MANDIPETE BRANCH DAVANAGERE (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CORPORATION BANK) REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER SRI SIKANDAR KUMAR.

¶15

SMT B LAXMIDEVI W/O HANUMANTHAPPA NO-569/10/10, 1ST STAGE,

¶16

¶17

NC: 2026:KHC:4758 WP No. 36007 of 2024

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

3RD CROSS, SHIVAKUMAR SWAMY BADAVANE. DAVANAGERE

¶20

SRI S BASAARAJAPPA S/O SANNA HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS BORROW (RESPONDER R/ AT TURCHAGHATTA VILLAGE, BELAVANUR POST DAVANAGERE TALLUK AND DISTRICT.,

¶21

SRI HALESH S H S/O SHEJAPPA MAJOR, R/AT NO-323/13 SHANTHINIVAS COMPOUND ASHOKA ROAD DAVANAGERE.. R/ AT TURCHAGHATTA VILLAGE,

¶22

…RESPONDENTS

¶23

(BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1)

¶24

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DAVANAGERE IN CRL MISC-321/2024, DATED 1911-2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A, IN SO FAR AS SCHEDULE A-1 OF THIS PETITION PROPERTY IS CONCERNED, PRAYED FOR DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENT NO-1 TO CONSIDER THE AFFIDAVIT OF THE PETITIONER DATED 04-12-2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-J.

¶25

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶26

¶27

NC: 2026:KHC:4758 WP No. 36007 of 2024

¶28

HC-KAR

¶29

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD

¶30

ORAL ORDER

¶31

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed

¶32

a memo which reads as under.

¶33

" In view of the above petition, the matter has been settled. Hence, the petitioner seeks to withdraw the said petition.

¶34

It is further submitted that the petitioner respectfully pray that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition."

¶35

The memo is accepted and the petition stands

¶36

dismissed as withdrawn.

¶37

Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE

¶38

Smt Rekha v. Union Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Rekha v. Union Bank of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Abhisheka Properties Vs the Principal Secretary

Charanpreet Kaur Vs State of Karnataka

Sri.Prakash Subramanian, Vs Union of India

Sri Apsar Pasha @ Kallu Vs State by

C R Ranganath Arun Vs M/S Aakruti Nirmiti Ltd.

The Manager, Gokula Gold Pvt. Ltd., Vs Sri D K Maheshwarappa